"The presence of anti-Pauline texts in [Matthew's] Gospel, point inevitably towards the conclusion that the evangelist himself [sic: really Jesus] was anti-Pauline." D.C. Sim [2002:780]

Relevant

A Joomla! Template for the Rest of Us

 

Search

Questions?

Please enter your questions, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. As an anti-spam measure, we ask that you re-type the code you see in the box below, prior to clicking "Send Message"






Recommendations

Only Jesus (great song by Big Daddy)

What Did Jesus Say? (2012) - 7 topics 

None above affiliated with me

JesusWordsOnS-cropsmall
JesusWordsSalv-crop2
DidCalvinMurderServetusM

October 15 2017 Email from Ch…F

Dear Brother Doug

Sorry it's taken so long to get back. The article you gave below says the following:

John Crossan and Jonathan Reed, in their latest work of 2004, explain the nature of this disparity, and notes Luke does not call Paul an Apostle with a capital A:

[I]n all his letters, Paul sees himself as an apostle sent from God through Christ. The very vocation for which Paul lives is denied him by Luke. He is, to be sure, an important missionary....But he is not an apostle equal to the Twelve. 

So if he's not an apostle and said he was, is he still an important missionary as stated in that quote?

 

My reply October 15, 2017

Hi Ch…

Due to Paul’s 14 year mystery period, and brief and small successes in the several missionary journeys, Paul was not in fact important as a missionary in the early church. I analyzed Acts, Paul’s letters and the early church records of the twelve’s evangelism. From thus, we can see how the church under the twelve operated so many more years earlier than Paul, with results in the myriads (tens of thousands, Luke records). By comparison,  Paul had little success for a small period of time from the time he arrives at Antioch...a church which Paul did not found. Paul maybe had near 100 converts, when you read Luke's Acts carefully. See this article: http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/214-paul-or-james-church-greatest-evangelist.html.

One of the reasons for Paul’s lack of success was that the 12 refused to give him letters of commendation, which Paul references. See this article: http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/727-proofs-the-12-apostles-rejected-paul.html

After Paul died, John eclipsed him in the churches where Paul had influence. Also, Paul’s writings were still excluded from canon through the two hundreds, proven by their separate publication apart from other NT writings. For proof, see the same last article cited.

Where does this idea come from that Paul is an important missionary?

It derives from misperceiving Luke’s purpose in the two volume work of Luke-Acts. Luke was writing a Roman investigator preparing Paul’s defense in the upcoming trial of Paul at Rome near 58 AD. The issue revolves around Paul’s companion named Trophimus who had entered the Temple uncircumcised...a capital offence in Hebrew Scripture which Rome enforced. However, Paul had the alibi that he was at a ceremonial bath at the time this happened. If Nero-Caesar thought Paul was a key leader of Christianity, and also an apostate opponent of Judaism who encouraged breaking its laws such as the Temple command at issue, then Nero in that trial could disallow Christianity to operate as a lawful sect under Rome’s approval of Judaism.  So Luke’s aim was to prove two things: (1) Paul is not a leader of the church,  but rather James and the 12 are...shown by Luke clearly in Acts 15 and 21, and (2) also that Paul was not an apostate from Judaism, especially its Law, but rather testified in court he believed in “all the Law....”

See this article: http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/735-luke-wrote-gospel-acts-for-investigator-to-help-paul-in-trial.html.

As a result, if we in look in depth at Luke-Acts, we see Luke only knows a Paul who endorses the Law, and who teaches that “works worthy of repentance” (see Acts ch. 26) and obeying Jesus are the path to salvation. See this article http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/465-luke-is-a-legitimate-gospel-history.html

 

As a result, Paulinism of today - no works of repentance or obedience to Jesus as necessary for salvation, but instead "you are saved" by merely believing Jesus died for your sins and rose again (1 Cor. 15:1-5) -- as a mainstream view is a unique phenomenon. Such Pauline views were only present after Paul died in the early church movement led by Marcion which Marcion started in 140 AD. However, Marcionism was routed as heretical by the mainstream church between 140 AD and 250 AD. See the article http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/recommendedreading/56-marcionism.html

Paul was only rehabilitated later — in the 300s — due to the advantage of his anti-Law and anti-Sabbath positions in the eyes of a pagan ruler named Constantine. For this ruler wanted Sunday to be the new Sabbath for all to worship his pagan god Sol Invictus...the god of the sun. See http://www.jesuswordsonly.com/topicindex/33-sabbathcommand.html It was then Paul’s epistles are first found printed joined either to othe epistles or sometimes even to the gospels.

Blessings Doug